<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Op-ed: We need to drill</title>
	<link>http://www.northupforcongress.com/archives/59</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 08:47:35 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Northup for Congress</title>
		<link>http://www.northupforcongress.com/archives/59#comment-799</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 19:26:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.northupforcongress.com/archives/59#comment-799</guid>
					<description>Mr. Cahoe,
	Thank you for your comment regarding Anne Northup’s position on drilling.  I’ve pasted below an op-ed article Anne Northup wrote for the Courier-Journal.  If you have more questions, please email or call us!

&lt;strong&gt;Oil reserves in Alaska, elsewhere could ease crisis&lt;/strong&gt;

By Anne M. Northup
Special to The Courier-Journal 
June 17, 2008

Two years ago, Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., and the Democrat Congress promised to devise a national energy policy and lower the cost of gas, which was about half the price it is now. When asked what he and the other Democrats have done to fulfill that pledge, Congressman John Yarmuth of Louisville points to the legislation they passed to suspend shipments to the Strategic Petroleum Reserve. He initially claimed this legislation &quot;could reduce prices by about … 25 cents per gallon of gasoline,&quot; but later downgraded the expected effect of this action to only 5 cents per gallon. It's a little surprising that anyone would boast about saving a nickel when gas prices have risen $1.63 since Yarmuth took office and the Democrats took control of Congress.

But there's more. Just last week, our representative joined 10 Democrats who filed a &quot;use it or lose it&quot; bill which would force oil companies to use the federal leases they currently have or forfeit them. The truth is, oil companies have had very little success with these leased lands, with 52 percent of the leases turning up no oil. Many more were leased for the purpose of recovering natural gas only. Other areas are prohibitive in terms of the cost to drill and questionable in the amount of recoverable oil. It is hard to fathom the thinking of a person who would propose forcing companies to drill all over the continent in places with marginal or no reserves, but refuses to allow drilling where there are plentiful reserves.
Other actions contemplated by the Democrats in Congress include suing OPEC to increase production. They also plan on launching their seventh investigation into &quot;price gougers&quot; and their fourth investigation into &quot;speculators.&quot; In addition, they want $20 billion in windfall profit taxes on oil producers, a failed strategy tried by a previous Democratic Congress in 1980 and signed into law by then-President Jimmy Carter. It stifled domestic oil production, resulting in an even greater dependence on foreign oil. One needn't be an energy expert to understand that none of these actions will produce one more drop of oil for our country.

By halting shipments to the SPR and trying to force OPEC or our own energy companies to increase production, the Democrats are at least indicating that they understand that increasing the supply of oil is vital to lowering our prices. The question is, why won't they take realistic, concrete steps to do that instead of trying to demonize the oil companies and posturing against OPEC?

We do not have to look overseas for our oil. Alaska's ANWR alone contains 10.4 billion barrels of oil. Likewise, the Outer Continental Shelf is estimated to contain 19 billion barrels of oil. There are other estimates that put our oil reserves in the hundreds of billions of barrels. When given the opportunity to tap these abundant resources, the House Democrats overwhelmingly opposed it while House Republicans overwhelmingly supported the increased production. Even when the Republicans were in the majority and passed it in the House, the Senate could not muster the 60 votes necessary to pass the bill and send it to the President because of Democratic opposition.

Recently, such large reserves of shale oil were discovered that some now refer the United States as the &quot;Saudi Arabia of shale oil.&quot; Yet last year this Congress banned all new shale oil extraction. That's right: No matter where or how safely it could be extracted, this new reserve is now off limits nationwide.

We know where the major reserves of clean, light and easy-to-refine crude oil are located. Even though a majority of people in this country believe we can harvest our oil in an environmentally safe manner, this Congress seems to be too frightened of an environmental lobby that has become increasingly irrational.

The high price of oil is jeopardizing the entire economy and our balance of trade. It has triggered fears of inflation and a subsequent recession around the country. From Wall Street to the unemployment office to family dinner tables, the talk moves from higher gas prices to higher food prices to higher unemployment to greater inflation, and a real fear of the economy collapsing is rising. As for our trade balance, when we depend on foreign oil and the price goes up, we ship more of our American dollars overseas. Today we send $500 billion to countries, most of whom do not even like us. This is simply unacceptable.

Conservation is important, but it's not enough. Some individuals can bike or carpool to work, or consolidate trips, or take a shorter vacation, but many people and many industries must depend on energy for their livelihood, and high fuel prices are threatening their survival. Hard-working truck drivers, farmers and airline workers rely on oil to fuel their businesses, as do millions of other Americans. Energy underpins our whole economy, and the long-term need for energy is vital.
The United States must start drilling now. While it will take years for the new oil to enter the marketplace, that is no excuse for not starting now. Economists agree that passing legislation to open up drilling in ANWR, the gulf and the Outer Continental Shelf will instantly lower oil prices. It will send a clear message to speculators and other countries that we are serious and proactive about solving our energy problems. In seven to 10 years, oil will start flowing from these and other explorations and will become an asset to our economy, improve our trade balance, increase our international competitiveness, and ensure that our national security is unthreatened by the need for foreign oil.

This will give us the time we need to begin a national path toward energy independence using not only our own oil, but clean coal, nuclear, fusion, hydrogen, solar and wind energy. There will be new economic confidence, a pride in our country's &quot;can-do&quot; determination and new technologies to export around the world.

Affordable, dependable energy is not a new issue. Economists have been warning us for years that energy independence and the need for more oil are critically important. For 10 years, I supported every effort to expand drilling in ANWR, in the gulf and off our coasts despite the political and personal attacks -- especially in the last election -- because the people in this district deserve a strong, honest leader who says what needs to be said. But today, this issue is more than a campaign issue. It is a national emergency. To purposely stand in the way of an obvious solution to a national crisis is inexcusable. Let's get going.

&lt;em&gt;Anne M. Northup is a former Republican congresswoman from Louisville. She is seeking election to her old seat this fall.&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. Cahoe,<br />
	Thank you for your comment regarding Anne Northup’s position on drilling.  I’ve pasted below an op-ed article Anne Northup wrote for the Courier-Journal.  If you have more questions, please email or call us!</p>
<p><strong>Oil reserves in Alaska, elsewhere could ease crisis</strong></p>
<p>By Anne M. Northup<br />
Special to The Courier-Journal<br />
June 17, 2008</p>
<p>Two years ago, Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., and the Democrat Congress promised to devise a national energy policy and lower the cost of gas, which was about half the price it is now. When asked what he and the other Democrats have done to fulfill that pledge, Congressman John Yarmuth of Louisville points to the legislation they passed to suspend shipments to the Strategic Petroleum Reserve. He initially claimed this legislation &#8220;could reduce prices by about … 25 cents per gallon of gasoline,&#8221; but later downgraded the expected effect of this action to only 5 cents per gallon. It&#8217;s a little surprising that anyone would boast about saving a nickel when gas prices have risen $1.63 since Yarmuth took office and the Democrats took control of Congress.</p>
<p>But there&#8217;s more. Just last week, our representative joined 10 Democrats who filed a &#8220;use it or lose it&#8221; bill which would force oil companies to use the federal leases they currently have or forfeit them. The truth is, oil companies have had very little success with these leased lands, with 52 percent of the leases turning up no oil. Many more were leased for the purpose of recovering natural gas only. Other areas are prohibitive in terms of the cost to drill and questionable in the amount of recoverable oil. It is hard to fathom the thinking of a person who would propose forcing companies to drill all over the continent in places with marginal or no reserves, but refuses to allow drilling where there are plentiful reserves.<br />
Other actions contemplated by the Democrats in Congress include suing OPEC to increase production. They also plan on launching their seventh investigation into &#8220;price gougers&#8221; and their fourth investigation into &#8220;speculators.&#8221; In addition, they want $20 billion in windfall profit taxes on oil producers, a failed strategy tried by a previous Democratic Congress in 1980 and signed into law by then-President Jimmy Carter. It stifled domestic oil production, resulting in an even greater dependence on foreign oil. One needn&#8217;t be an energy expert to understand that none of these actions will produce one more drop of oil for our country.</p>
<p>By halting shipments to the SPR and trying to force OPEC or our own energy companies to increase production, the Democrats are at least indicating that they understand that increasing the supply of oil is vital to lowering our prices. The question is, why won&#8217;t they take realistic, concrete steps to do that instead of trying to demonize the oil companies and posturing against OPEC?</p>
<p>We do not have to look overseas for our oil. Alaska&#8217;s ANWR alone contains 10.4 billion barrels of oil. Likewise, the Outer Continental Shelf is estimated to contain 19 billion barrels of oil. There are other estimates that put our oil reserves in the hundreds of billions of barrels. When given the opportunity to tap these abundant resources, the House Democrats overwhelmingly opposed it while House Republicans overwhelmingly supported the increased production. Even when the Republicans were in the majority and passed it in the House, the Senate could not muster the 60 votes necessary to pass the bill and send it to the President because of Democratic opposition.</p>
<p>Recently, such large reserves of shale oil were discovered that some now refer the United States as the &#8220;Saudi Arabia of shale oil.&#8221; Yet last year this Congress banned all new shale oil extraction. That&#8217;s right: No matter where or how safely it could be extracted, this new reserve is now off limits nationwide.</p>
<p>We know where the major reserves of clean, light and easy-to-refine crude oil are located. Even though a majority of people in this country believe we can harvest our oil in an environmentally safe manner, this Congress seems to be too frightened of an environmental lobby that has become increasingly irrational.</p>
<p>The high price of oil is jeopardizing the entire economy and our balance of trade. It has triggered fears of inflation and a subsequent recession around the country. From Wall Street to the unemployment office to family dinner tables, the talk moves from higher gas prices to higher food prices to higher unemployment to greater inflation, and a real fear of the economy collapsing is rising. As for our trade balance, when we depend on foreign oil and the price goes up, we ship more of our American dollars overseas. Today we send $500 billion to countries, most of whom do not even like us. This is simply unacceptable.</p>
<p>Conservation is important, but it&#8217;s not enough. Some individuals can bike or carpool to work, or consolidate trips, or take a shorter vacation, but many people and many industries must depend on energy for their livelihood, and high fuel prices are threatening their survival. Hard-working truck drivers, farmers and airline workers rely on oil to fuel their businesses, as do millions of other Americans. Energy underpins our whole economy, and the long-term need for energy is vital.<br />
The United States must start drilling now. While it will take years for the new oil to enter the marketplace, that is no excuse for not starting now. Economists agree that passing legislation to open up drilling in ANWR, the gulf and the Outer Continental Shelf will instantly lower oil prices. It will send a clear message to speculators and other countries that we are serious and proactive about solving our energy problems. In seven to 10 years, oil will start flowing from these and other explorations and will become an asset to our economy, improve our trade balance, increase our international competitiveness, and ensure that our national security is unthreatened by the need for foreign oil.</p>
<p>This will give us the time we need to begin a national path toward energy independence using not only our own oil, but clean coal, nuclear, fusion, hydrogen, solar and wind energy. There will be new economic confidence, a pride in our country&#8217;s &#8220;can-do&#8221; determination and new technologies to export around the world.</p>
<p>Affordable, dependable energy is not a new issue. Economists have been warning us for years that energy independence and the need for more oil are critically important. For 10 years, I supported every effort to expand drilling in ANWR, in the gulf and off our coasts despite the political and personal attacks &#8212; especially in the last election &#8212; because the people in this district deserve a strong, honest leader who says what needs to be said. But today, this issue is more than a campaign issue. It is a national emergency. To purposely stand in the way of an obvious solution to a national crisis is inexcusable. Let&#8217;s get going.</p>
<p><em>Anne M. Northup is a former Republican congresswoman from Louisville. She is seeking election to her old seat this fall.</em>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: James Cahoe</title>
		<link>http://www.northupforcongress.com/archives/59#comment-764</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 21:23:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.northupforcongress.com/archives/59#comment-764</guid>
					<description>I was for drilling in ANWR and wrote John Yarmuth to tell him so.  He replied with a detailed explanation of the current move to get the oil companies to use the leases they already have, which would bring in domestic oil faster than ANWR drilling.  I checked his references on the Dept of Energy website and his facts seemed correct.  Especially the claim that even if we tapped into ANWR it would have a minor impact on imports.  I have asked for the perspective from Mitch McConnell and also went directly to Exxon to get their rationale.  I still haven't recieved a response.  I want to make sure we have a representative in office that makes decisions based on facts, not politics, or conventional wisdom (which is usually wrong)or a Party rubber stamp.  I'd appreciate a response from Anne on this.  I'd be glad to forward the complete response I got from Yarmuth so you can challenge his arguing points.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was for drilling in ANWR and wrote John Yarmuth to tell him so.  He replied with a detailed explanation of the current move to get the oil companies to use the leases they already have, which would bring in domestic oil faster than ANWR drilling.  I checked his references on the Dept of Energy website and his facts seemed correct.  Especially the claim that even if we tapped into ANWR it would have a minor impact on imports.  I have asked for the perspective from Mitch McConnell and also went directly to Exxon to get their rationale.  I still haven&#8217;t recieved a response.  I want to make sure we have a representative in office that makes decisions based on facts, not politics, or conventional wisdom (which is usually wrong)or a Party rubber stamp.  I&#8217;d appreciate a response from Anne on this.  I&#8217;d be glad to forward the complete response I got from Yarmuth so you can challenge his arguing points.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Will C.</title>
		<link>http://www.northupforcongress.com/archives/59#comment-18</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 19:46:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.northupforcongress.com/archives/59#comment-18</guid>
					<description>What should be a simple decision for our &quot;Representatives&quot; has turned into a political football that everyone wants to pass. We need individuals like Anne back in Congress to protect the middle-class American's pocketbook and stand up for our best interests in Washington.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What should be a simple decision for our &#8220;Representatives&#8221; has turned into a political football that everyone wants to pass. We need individuals like Anne back in Congress to protect the middle-class American&#8217;s pocketbook and stand up for our best interests in Washington.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Michael C. Guinn</title>
		<link>http://www.northupforcongress.com/archives/59#comment-13</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 23:16:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.northupforcongress.com/archives/59#comment-13</guid>
					<description>Ann,
I voted for you in this primary and congratulations on your most excellent win.

1:  Are you going to stand up for CONSERVATIVE principles in the House?  I need to know for sure.
There are too many rino's in the Republican Party who are currently serving in the House and Senate. 

2:  I WANT DOMESTIC OIL AND I WANT IT NOW!!

See WorldNetkDaily May 21, 2008:  31,00 scientists reject gloam warming agenda and also click the link on the petition projectin the same article  Edward Teller, Ph.D. wrote the cover letter.  This is a big deal.

See: Thomas Sowell's article &quot;Too Complex&quot; parts one, two and three beginning May 13, 2008

See: Kipling Business Resource Center May 17, 2008 article titled &quot; The U.S. Is Poised to Hit a New Oil Gusher

See:  Environmental Chemistry .com &quot;CO2 Pollution and Global Warming&quot;

I'm sick and tired of doing research for my own benefit and knowledge and politicians and newscasters are constantly making ad hominem statements about the climate and causes of the oil price hikes and showing me no proof. I'm so sick that some days I want to throw up. Really.

3:  The House and Senate want the Dept of Justice to sue OPEC? LOL

4: Nancy Pelosi and other Dems want to take oil company profits and take away their tax breaks.  That's going to help me at the pump how??????

5:  War On Terror. We are winning in Iraq.  Do not fall for another Walter Cronkite Tet Offensive we have lost the war comments from anybody when in fact we are winning. Cronkite LIED to the American people, thus causing my generation to be blamed for losing the Viet Nam War. We were within 14 days of seeing a white flag from the North Vietnamese.  That's a fact.  Look it up.

Feel free to contact me.

Michael C. Guinn
904 Forest Bridge Road
Louisville, Ky 40223-5116
email:  theknight70@insightbb.com
alternate email:  theknight70@gmail.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ann,<br />
I voted for you in this primary and congratulations on your most excellent win.</p>
<p>1:  Are you going to stand up for CONSERVATIVE principles in the House?  I need to know for sure.<br />
There are too many rino&#8217;s in the Republican Party who are currently serving in the House and Senate. </p>
<p>2:  I WANT DOMESTIC OIL AND I WANT IT NOW!!</p>
<p>See WorldNetkDaily May 21, 2008:  31,00 scientists reject gloam warming agenda and also click the link on the petition projectin the same article  Edward Teller, Ph.D. wrote the cover letter.  This is a big deal.</p>
<p>See: Thomas Sowell&#8217;s article &#8220;Too Complex&#8221; parts one, two and three beginning May 13, 2008</p>
<p>See: Kipling Business Resource Center May 17, 2008 article titled &#8221; The U.S. Is Poised to Hit a New Oil Gusher</p>
<p>See:  Environmental Chemistry .com &#8220;CO2 Pollution and Global Warming&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sick and tired of doing research for my own benefit and knowledge and politicians and newscasters are constantly making ad hominem statements about the climate and causes of the oil price hikes and showing me no proof. I&#8217;m so sick that some days I want to throw up. Really.</p>
<p>3:  The House and Senate want the Dept of Justice to sue OPEC? LOL</p>
<p>4: Nancy Pelosi and other Dems want to take oil company profits and take away their tax breaks.  That&#8217;s going to help me at the pump how??????</p>
<p>5:  War On Terror. We are winning in Iraq.  Do not fall for another Walter Cronkite Tet Offensive we have lost the war comments from anybody when in fact we are winning. Cronkite LIED to the American people, thus causing my generation to be blamed for losing the Viet Nam War. We were within 14 days of seeing a white flag from the North Vietnamese.  That&#8217;s a fact.  Look it up.</p>
<p>Feel free to contact me.</p>
<p>Michael C. Guinn<br />
904 Forest Bridge Road<br />
Louisville, Ky 40223-5116<br />
email:  <a href="mailto:theknight70@insightbb.com">theknight70@insightbb.com</a><br />
alternate email:  <a href="mailto:theknight70@gmail.com">theknight70@gmail.com</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
